今日の日本語の授業は好きじゃなかった。舞のCCをべんきょうしなかったからはなしにくかった。テストはちょっといいのほうだった。たいてい聞いて分かり難いけどきょうのはもっとやさしかったとおもう。
As for work, I ran out of things to do and had to end early. To no benefit of mine apparently. Oh yeah. Don't try spellcheck with japanese.
Feels strange to actually have the desire to post, and even more strange to actually post about normal life events. How about a little philosophical thinking.
So my most current thoughts are on the way people appeal to another's sense of good and evil. What method of convincing does a person like to use when trying to convince or convice another of something? The answer to this opening question is easy; people all employ different methods. Pastor Scott appeals to the emotions (I know this is quite broad, but I haven't narrowed it yet), Andie appeals to what has baring on the public appearence, I (try to) appeal to the most essential logic, Mom appeals to what is benificial (which looks like "right"ness), Dad's is to what is success. These all have their limits as goverened by one's drives and motives and p2p relational skills, but there is something underneath that is instinctively followed in these steps. (And obviously can be changed over time)
So it's not too hard to find this part of the answer, but what does it mean after that? I wonder if a persons ability to identify with another will actually make them easier to convince. Or if this helps with actually convincing someone of somthing. Probably, looking back at books like "How to win friends and influence people". Okay, then how does it affect marrages?
-Hunter
-ハンター
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment